Chiedu Ebie NDDC Chairman
…Dismisses suit against Tinubu, others
The Federal High Court sitting in Abuja, on Thursday, declined to sack the Chairman of the Niger Delta Development Commission, NDDC, Mr. Chiedu Ebie.
The court, in a judgement that was delivered by Justice Joyce Abdulmalik, dismissed a legal action that oil producing communities in Bayelsa and Delta state filed against President Bola Tinubu over Ebie’s appointment.
The communities had approached the court to nullify what they termed as President Tinubu’s illegal appointment in the NDDC.
According to the plaintiffs, President Tinubu’s appointee, Mr. Ebie, was not qualified to head the board of the NDDC in view of the fact that he is not from “the oil producing area with the highest quantum of oil production.”
Insisting that the appointment was in breach of extant provisions of the NDDC Act, the plaintiffs, prayed the court to intervene in the matter.
Aside from President Tinubu, other defendants in the suit, were; the Senate President, the Attorney-General of the Federation, the NDDC and Ebie himself.
The communities told the court that though the 5th defendant, Ebie, is from an oil producing community, however, “the oil produced therefrom is insufficient, thus by the provisions of the law, he is unqualified for appointment as the Chairman of the 4th defendant’s board (NDDC).”
Though the suit marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/28/2024, was initially brought before the court by three oil producing communities in Ekeremor Local Government Area of Bayelsa State- Bisangbene, Agge and Amatu1- through their leaders, Chief Goodnews Gereghewei, Chief Eddy Brayei and Mr Jonah Engineyouwei.
However, communities in Delta state later applied and were joined as plaintiffs in the matter.
Whereas Chief Jerry Mulade-Aroh represented Gbaramatu Kingdom, Mr Jolomi Itsekure stood in for Itsekiri Oil and Gas producing communities, while Hon. Friday Ugedi represented Egbema Kingdom in Delta state.
Delivering judgement in the matter on Thursday, Justice Abdulmalik held that the case of the plaintiffs had become statute barred.
She held that the plaintiffs failed to institute the action within three months after President Tinubu made the appointment, as prescribed by the law.
The court noted that while Ebie was appointed to head the NDDC on August 29, 2023, the plaintiffs filed the suit on January 11, 2024, stressing that section 24(1) and (2) of the NDDC Act placed a limitation on the litigants.
More so, the court held that the suit was not properly commenced as the plaintiffs failed to seek its leave to apply for a judicial review of President Tinubu’s action.
The court held that since the suit was not properly initiated, it, therefore, lacked the requisite jurisdiction to grant any of the reliefs that was sought by the plaintiffs.
Consequently, it dismissed the suit and held that all the issues that were raised by the plaintiffs had become academic.
President Tinubu and the AGF had through their lawyer, Mrs. Maimuna Lami Ashiru, challenged the competence of the suit.
Likewise, counsel for the National Assembly, Mr. Umaru Jibril, as well as that of the NDDC and Ebie, Mr. Emmanuel Akumaye, urged the court to dismiss the suit for want of merit.
